Skip to content
-
Subscribe to our newsletter & never miss our best posts. Subscribe Now!
Today's News. Tomorrow's Perspective. Today's News. Tomorrow's Perspective.

Deliver fast, factual, and easy-to-understand news covering global events, technology, business, science, AI, health, entertainment, and lifestyle.

Today's News. Tomorrow's Perspective. Today's News. Tomorrow's Perspective.

Deliver fast, factual, and easy-to-understand news covering global events, technology, business, science, AI, health, entertainment, and lifestyle.

  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Technology & AI
  • World
  • Home
  • Breaking News
  • Business
  • Sports
  • Health
  • Politics
  • Technology & AI
  • World
Close

Search

Subscribe
Breaking NewsFeatured

Eleon
By Eleon
November 2, 2026 3 Min Read
Comments Off on

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images


hide caption

Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images

A day before Election Day, the Justice Department is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to wade into an unprecedented feud with California over the state’s voter rolls.

The appeal is the department’s latest foray into the state’s election administration, which a federal judge last week called “an attempt at widespread and ongoing election interference by federal officials.”

After that judge, Clinton appointee David Carter, and a divided panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the DOJ’s request to order California to void and stop processing the ballots of thousands of people, the DOJ filed an opinion Monday. that she seeks an injunction from the High Court.

People extract ballots from their envelopes and prepare them to be scanned for counting in the vote-by-mail processing commissions area of ​​the Orange County Registrar of Voters office in Santa Ana, California, October 28.

The DOJ says it has identified 20,000 “likely” non-citizens on California’s voter rolls whose ballots should not be counted until their citizenship is verified.

So far, courts have sided with California and Los Angeles County that the federal government’s list is unreliable and that creating a new system to separate ballots while voting is already underway is unworkable.

“There is a significant risk that granting the United States the requested relief would result in disenfranchisement and could jeopardize the county’s entire election,” 9th Circuit Judges Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, and Gabriel Sanchez, a Biden appointee, wrote in their Friday ruling denying the Justice Department’s emergency request.

Both justices cited long-standing legal precedent, known as the Purcell principle, that election rules should not be changed on the eve of an election, as well as the fact that the Constitution gives states the power to hold elections. The notice also cites the National Voter Registration Act, which prohibits states from systematically removing ineligible voters within 90 days of a federal election.

Los Angeles County Registrar Dean Logan speaks during a news conference on June 2, 2026. His office confirmed to NPR on Thursday that it received grand jury subpoenas issued to the employees last week.

The actual number of ballots in dispute is likely well below 20,000, since county election officials found that many people on the DOJ’s list were not registered voters and did not receive ballots by mail.

Over the weekend, data scientists at the Voting Rights Project at the University of California, Los Angeles, gained access to the DOJ list through a court order in a separate lawsuit and found that 42 percent of the names on the list do not appear on California’s current voter rolls. This analysis also found naturalized citizens on the DOJ list.

The Justice Department’s appeal to the Supreme Court comes as it has escalated its feud with California election officials.

In recent weeks, the Justice Department has sent subpoenas to California election officials and reminded officials that they could be criminally prosecuted for allowing ineligible voters to cast ballots.

A federal judge in San Francisco issued a temporary restraining order late Friday prohibiting the Trump administration from threatening, intimidating or coercing election officials into demanding that they stop processing the ballots of registered voters who the federal government says are ineligible. Le gouvernement fédéral a fait appel de cette ordonnance.

Gn headline

Views: 4
Eleon
Author

Eleon

With a passion for accurate reporting and in-depth research, Eleon covers breaking news, industry developments, and emerging trends that matter to readers worldwide. Their work focuses on delivering factual, balanced, and easy-to-understand journalism backed by reliable sources.At DailyVoxa, every article is produced in accordance with our Editorial Policy, Fact-Checking Policy, and Ethics Policy to ensure accuracy, transparency, and editorial independence.

Follow Me
Other Articles
Trump's Midterm Election Speech Closes Roads Around Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Monday – WTOP News
Previous

Trump’s Midterm Election Speech Closes Roads Around Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool Monday – WTOP News

Northwood Space Raises $375M Series C at $2B Valuation from a16z and DFJ Growth
Next

Northwood Space Raises $375M Series C at $2B Valuation from a16z and DFJ Growth

Deliver fast, factual, and easy-to-understand news covering global events, technology, business, science, AI, health, entertainment, and lifestyle.
  • About Us
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Advertise With Us
  • AI Usage & Transparency Policy
  • Contact us
  • Cookie Policy
  • Corrections Policy
  • Meet Our Team
  • Privacy Policy
    • Disclaimer
    • DMCA & Copyright Policy
    • Editorial Policy
    • Ethics Policy
    • Fact-Checking Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
Copyright 2026 — Today's News. Tomorrow's Perspective.. All rights reserved.