Americans Never Had So Much Money in Stocks – Not Even in the Dotcom Bubble: Chart of the Day
Your parents’ nest egg consisted mainly of bonds and savings accounts. Yours is mostly made up of stocks.
Stocks accounted for 48.2% of Americans’ financial assets in the second quarter, from brokerage accounts to 401(k)s, according to the latest Federal Reserve financial accounts data. This is the highest share since 1945. It exceeds the 38.7% reached at the height of the dot-com craze and the 41% reached after the meme stock frenzy of 2021.
In comparison, the cash reserve seems small. Households hold about $74 trillion in stocks, compared to about $20 trillion in bank deposits and money market funds, or a record $3.65 in stocks for every dollar of cash.
So much for all that money sitting on the sidelines.
Who are the “Americans” really?
There is fine print. The Fed’s household category is a catch-all that also includes nonprofits, and the central bank says its estimates for this group are “largely residual, derived from data from other sectors.”
Ownership is also unbalanced. The richest 1% of households own about half of all stocks and equity funds, and the richest 10% own 88%, according to Fed distribution data. The bottom half has about 2%.
America is not entirely interested in stocks. Rich America is.
Most of the increase is also due to rising prices and not a buying frenzy. When stocks rebound and everything else stays still, stocks alone take up a bigger piece of the pie.
What this meant for returns
History suggests that a crowded trade tends to produce less.
When stocks represented less than 20% of household financial assets, the S&P 500 (^GSPC) continued to gain a median of about 11% per year over the next decade, according to Yahoo Finance calculations using price returns since 1951. When the stock rose above 30%, it fell to about 5%.
The logic is simple. A low share means there is plenty of money left to invest in stocks, usually at bargain prices. A high share means a lot of this buying has already happened and valuations are tight.
This is a decade-long signal, not a timing tool. Most of the high numbers come from the bubble of the late 1990s and the years before the 2008 financial crisis. Today’s level exceeds anything recorded.
What it can do is cause a wallet check. An investor who established a 60/40 mix of stocks and bonds in early 2023 and never rebalanced would now have about 73% in stocks, according to Yahoo Finance calculations.
That’s a lot more risk than they signed up for.
A cushion, for now
With so much wealth tied up in the market, a selloff like the one hitting AI stocks can reduce consumer spending faster than before. Household balance sheets still have room to absorb one.
Gn bussni
